User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) detects anomalies, but attackers adapt their tactics. Learn why UEBA is not enough and how AI-driven threat detection uncovers real threats in real time.
UEBA identifies anomalous user and entity behavior, but it relies on predefined baselines and statistical models that attackers can evade. Sophisticated threats, insider attacks, and cloud-based compromises often bypass UEBA detections, leaving security teams with too many false positives and a lack of real-time visibility into attacker behavior.
Attackers blend into normal activity, slowly escalating privileges to avoid triggering anomalies.
UEBA often lacks deep visibility into modern cloud and SaaS applications, where identity-based attacks occur.
UEBA generates a high volume of alerts, making it difficult for SOC teams to focus on real threats.
In the Scattered Spider scenario below, UEBA fails not because it’s irrelevant—but because it lacks the speed, scope, and specificity to detect attacker behavior in a modern hybrid attack.
UEBA analyzes behavior, but it lacks real-time detection and deep context into attacker movement across networks, cloud, and identities. Attackers who slowly change behavior or use stolen credentials can bypass UEBA entirely.
UEBA applies statistical modeling and behavioral baselining, but:
UEBA identifies deviations from normal behavior, but it struggles to detect slow, stealthy, and cloud-based attacks. The Vectra AI Platform provides real-time threat detection that exposes attacker movement beyond behavioral anomalies.
Vectra AI maps identity behavior over time, tracking what is considered normal for both human and non-human identities. This allows the system to detect privilege abuse, unauthorized lateral movement, and risky automation behaviors—all with 96% fewer alerts than traditional UEBA solutions.
UEBA identifies anomalies, while Vectra AI detects real threats beyond behavior deviations. Here’s how they compare: